Peoples first impressions of the ogre Shrek Essay Example

Peoples first impressions of the ogre Shrek Paper Peoples first impressions of the ogre Shrek, is that he is not in anyway traditional. He is seen as a cross between the traditional Disney style of films and the not so traditional style of entertainment such as The Simpsons. The comedy and jokes can be understood by all generations, young and old. Simple put, Shrek is a fairy tale for everyone, with a hero much the same. The film begins with the opening of a typical fairy tale book being read by the narrator. The traditional theme is read, about a damsel in distress, and a so called Prince Charming going to rescue her. However in Shrek the narrator, when he gets to the last page rips it out, and proclaims, what a load of rubbish. The door of a toilet is then flung open, and Shrek steps out. There is also a comparison of the toilet being flushed, right after Shrek tears out the last page of the book. This shows what Shrek thinks of the happy ending of the book. Early on in the play the producers of Shrek use modern rap music in the background, which gives an indication that this is no ordinary fairy tale. Shrek seems like a traditional ogre because after the introduction to Shrek is done it shows a different side to his personality. We will write a custom essay sample on Peoples first impressions of the ogre Shrek specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Peoples first impressions of the ogre Shrek specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Peoples first impressions of the ogre Shrek specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer He intimidates the villagers who were plotting to kill him by doing both the normal and expected way and the unexpected way. The normal way, that you expect Shrek, an ogre to do, is roar at them and scare them away, which he does and succeeds doings, but he does not eat them. Instead he creates a sence of terror among the villagers. He sneaks up stealthily behind them and politely points out to villagers that ogres are much worse than giants. He says ogres will do such things as, shave your liver, make a soup from your skin, and squeeze jelly from your eyes. He then roars at them and they run away which suggests Shrek probably just wants a quiet life in the swamp where he lives and to be by himself. What Shrek does not need is a cocky and witty talking donkey as a friend. He also does not want a bunch of Disney, fairy tale characters placed in his swamp. This shows that Shrek is a loner and does not want people around him. The character Donkey is an important character to the film Shrek. He is the one that brings Shrek down to reality, that he is not as scary as he thinks he is, for example, when Shrek tries to intimidate Donkey by roaring at him, Donkey irritates Shrek about his bad breath. He says, if that doesnt do the job your breath certainly will because your breath stinks! He also suggests to Shrek that he should use some Tic-Tacs. This shows that Donkey isnt scared or afraid of Shrek. This is supported well by the fact that Donkey, follows Shrek to his swamp ignoring all the beware ogre signs. He races excited into the Shreks home, jumps around, and says, in the morning Im making waffles. Shrek then gets Donkey out of his home, and forces him to sleep outside in the cold. As Shrek sits down to his meal, he shows a small amount of remorse to the fact that he has kicked Donkey out of the house but he quickly recovers. Shrek then hears a lot of scuffling around his house and blames Donkey but soon finds out that it was not him, but some fairty tale characters who had arrived at his swamp, from snow white to pinochio. Shrek finds out from Pinochio that the evil and extremely short Lord Farquaad has forced them there. He then, takes the quest to Lord Farquaad to get his swamp back aided by Donkey for the simple reason that he cannot get rid of him. When Shrek and Donkey arrive at the village of Duloc Shrek insults Lord Farquaad. He asks Donkey, whether Lord Farquaad is compensating for something, comparing is huge castle to Lord Farquaads height. The camera shots used in the film are put to great effect. A variety of camera angles are used in the film to portray different things. These camera angles are Low, Mid, High and Close up. The Close up camera angle is used when Shrek attempts to scare the fairytale creatures away. It gives off the impression that Shrek, is going to eat them. The darkness surrounding him, adds to the feeling of unease. Close up shots are useful for focusing the audiences attention on the characters emotions. This is presented when Princess Fiona is shown smiling with Shrek. The camera switches between them, and gives a sense of happiness. The low angle shots are used, to show superiority in some characters. For example when Lord Farquaad, talks to Shrek in the fighting arena he is on the top level and is looking down on everyone else. He is nearly always presented in a shot with him above, who ever else he is talking to. This shows the other characters vulnerability. It also shows his superiority. In the case of Shrek, it shows his presence and his size. For example, when he tells the fairytale characters to get out of his swamp, the camera pans down to show his size. It gives him the look of a tall, mean ogre who means business. The high angle shots are used when Shrek and Donkey enters the village. They look up at the castle and it shows the size of it. This in turn shows how wealthy Lord Farquaad is. Mid angle shots are used to show characters talking and socialising, and it puts them on equal footing. It shows neither of them higher or lower than the other. For example when Shrek and Donkey are lying down together or when Shrek cooks Fiona a meal. This gives people the chance to see the characters interacting with each other and gives the audience the chance to get to know there characters better. There are good mixtures of shots as well. For example when Lord Farquaad is first shown in the film, it uses a combination of shots rather than a full on shot. This is done to disguise his height and create tension. The first shot the audience see is of his hands rather than his face. He puts on a pair of gloves as if he means business. It is shots like these that build up the crucial first opinion of the character.

10 Skills You Probably Don’t Realize You Need To Get Hired

10 Skills You Probably Don’t Realize You Need To Get Hired Hiring managers frequently have to choose between candidates of similar caliber and qualifications. That decision is most often made on â€Å"soft skills,† rather than the laundry list of relevant experience and specific job-related expertise, so it’s increasingly important to work on those elusive extra elements. Here are the top 10.Writing SkillsThought when you majored in Biology that your days of English papers and diagramming sentences were behind you? Think again. Writing skills are always important- even more so now, when so many positions are set up to work remotely and require extensive email or chat-based communication. You must be able to express yourself clearly and correctly and communicate effectively, or you’ll start losing out.If you’re really in the woods, consider taking a writing course online or at a continuing education center. It can make all the difference down the road.Speaking SkillsYou can be great on paper, but still not know how to talk to people. Even if you’re not the client interface type, you’d be surprised how many hiring managers would prefer to hire someone who can communicate effectively face-to-face. Make sure listening is part of your communication process as well.ConfidenceThere’s a difference between self-esteem (or being assertive) and being a jerk. Once you figure out where that line is, confidence adds major sparkle factor and can end up netting you the job. Learn to project this kind of aura of success.If you’re short on it- or shy- never fear. It isn’t a genetics-given gift; it can be built up slowly but surely. Fake it ‘til you make it!Self-ManagingEven if your new boss is a micromanager, chances are she still wants you to be able to manage yourself most of the time. This means managing your time effectively, self-starting, and maintaining optimum productivity. The more you can effectively manage your own time and showcase that you can, the better and more likely you are to get the job.HobnobbingNetworking might not ever be stated as a job requirement, but it’s a necessary skill for any job. Knowing how to work a room and charm people is a huge component of most successful career paths. Buff up your network and your networking skills; they can get you the job and set you up for anything that might come next.Computer SkillsEven if you’re a total dummy when it comes to technology, you have to work at it. Today’s market simply requires you to have some savvy with basic technology and software. There are tons of tutorials online. Brush up on the programs and communication tools your position would require before the interview. At very least, be an email wizard- prompt and precise.Critical ThinkingThis is the number one ineffable skill you’re supposed to learn in college. Your future boss needs to know that you not only  follow orders, but  you also are actively engaged in problem solving and strate gic thinking. Creativity is key. And simple things- like the ability to look at a problem from every angle, or consider an opposite position- can go a long way, both in life and on the job.NegotiationYou don’t just need negotiation skills for salary discussions. They come in very useful during  conflict resolution and problem solving, as well. Do a bit of reading into how you can improve these skills.TeamworkNo one cares how fancy your credentials are; if you can’t work well with the team, you’re not going to get the job. So check your ego at the door and learn to be a team player.Pick a career wherein you feel you would fit the workplace culture, so you’re not constantly trying to fit yourself into an awkward box. Learn to give and take constructive criticism, how to collaborate, and how to build trust with other members of your team.Emotional IntelligenceThis goes hand-in-hand with teamwork. It’s just not possible to be socially or emotionally tone-deaf anymore. Sensitivity to the needs and feelings of your co-workers is a must. Learn to really listen and hear what people are saying. And be able to convert your knowledge into real empathy. You won’t just get a better job; you’ll be a better person.

Is it political culture, social cleavages or inherited institutions Essay

Is it political culture, social cleavages or inherited institutions that has the most significant influence on the current problems facing the consolidation of - Essay Example The repercussions f the Russian and Asian financial crises, together with the apparent fraying f Cardoso's governing coalition and a unilateral moratorium on federal debts declared by some states, exposed the fiscal and political fragility f Cardoso's policy agenda. Brazil's ability to recover quickly from the global economic shocks and Cardoso's success in winning legislative assent on major structural reforms as f May 2000 reveal as much his political skill as the many overlooked strengths and growing versatility f the Brazilian political system. The discussions in the texts to be reviewed here place in crisper perspective the political and institutional conundrum facing Cardoso's administration. The seven books share many features. Each in its own way addresses critical political and institutional issues facing Brazil today. For most f these analysts, the central question is, why has Brazil's new democracy performed so poorly in terms f redistributive reforms and democratic governance Why has the return to democracy resulted in neither good governance nor improvements in the country's profound social deficit While the authors have their own distinctive approaches and ways f framing f the central problem, this review will focus mainly on the themes f democratic governance and social welfare. As a group, the works under review here reveal four shortcomings. First, they understate the achievements f democracy in Brazil. This assessment stems in part from mostly normative hidden assumptions about an ideal type f democracy, in c omparison with which the performance f Brazilian democracy falls short. Second, these authors perceive more continuities than breaks in Brazilian political development, with corrosive practices and institutions f the past remaining intact--or even strengthened-following the transition to democracy. Third, they underestimate the capacity f the three key political institutions in Brazil--the parties, the legislature, and the executive or generalize about their hypothesized weakness. This problem is especially egregious in the analysis by Ronald Schneider, who describes the Brazilian party system as "primitive" and blames the "dysfunctional public sector" as the root cause f the country's economic and political crises. But the problem is equally visible in the books by Souza, Weyland, and Hagopian. Despite a growing body f research showing otherwise, (Martins 78-93) several f the texts reviewed here illustrate how works on Brazilian party systems and legislative-executive relations con tinue to be dominated by outdated, impressionistic, and overdrawn arguments and evidence. The first signs f a modern democratic government in Brazil appeared in 1945 when the military deposed President Getlio Vargas. Vargas had created a "semi-corporatist authoritarian regime (the Estado Nvo) based largely on the military." Once Vargas had been removed from power, Brazil instituted a competitive multi-party system. Multi-party systems are not a requirement for democracy, "but certainly the history f democratization has been associated with the development f parties and their legitimation." This step towards a true democratic government was negated in 1964 when the military forced a reversion to an authoritarian form f rule. The president remained the top government official, but he was